every life should have more than one act but no more than five

every life should have more than one act but no more than five

fiction
edward w pritchard

Every life should have more than one act but no more than five. What I am meaning here is how a baby's eyes that one has connected with express thousands of unspoken thoughts and sentiments instantly to the a-tuned lover/ receptor [1] and how scientifically other than light going in to those fascinating eyes to the babies brain no known scientific material process substance or ray/wave is actually coming out of those beautiful and intriguing eyes to the a-tuned lover/receptor who more often than not is performing the  ordinary, mundane task of caring for the " helpless" infant at the time of the mystic cosmic connection eye to eye in question; usually as the baby's Mother, but sometimes as dear old Grand Ma or Omey, Pa pa or just plain old ed. Prosaically that a-tuned connection between baby and grand-ma changes as baby matures and learns to communicate with language and predictably the nick names for Grandma change as the baby's masters the use of language and logical thought processes throughout the various " five acts' of a babies life.

The only other similar connection that old ed knows of that, that as expressed above, is, similarly non scientific and perhaps metaphysically/transcendent  apparent is with a Lover, but in that case, unlike with a Baby which a receptor can have more than one connection with other babies, perhaps half a dozen, including children descendants and other grand children, with a Lover that eye to eye mystery, connection, happens only once. The other times being strictly organic and materialistic.

Many attuned persons throughout time have sensed/experienced  the a-tuned lover/receptor eye to eye cosmic connection mentioned above in terms of " is there anything in iron clad reality and provable scientifically to suggest the actual existence of a soul, or spirit part of anything that survives the Body, after death" but alas such persons having the original sensed/ experience have never communicated the iron clad evidence after their death to  scientifically prove the conundrum. Still many persons living and dead heart felt-ed-ly  wonder if there is anything non material and scientifically provable that survives a defunct human after death.  Of course there are other forces involved such as time/tensed time  argument and as discussed recently the "selfish gene" theory [of Richard Dawkins], etc. etc.

1. original idea recently expressed by another